[Rps] Re: Last Call: 'RPSLng' to Proposed Standard
Mark Prior mrp at mrp.net
Tue Sep 16 13:05:50 CEST 2003
Curtis Villamizar wrote: > Transition issues are very important in a RR. You have to assume that > old software will be around for quite a long time. Someone is bound > to be using old code for a very long time. > I'm not disputing that. What I am suggesting is that if there was a version number (say) negotiation mechanism then new code could negotiate for support of new features with a server but without this a new server would return old style data (which will avoid the old code barfing). Mark.
[ rpslng Archives ]