[routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Nov 9 22:07:45 CET 2022
I would look at the precedent of things like RIPE-NONAUTH for time and duration. Sent via RFC1925 compliant device > On Nov 9, 2022, at 8:02 PM, Netmaster (exAS286) <netmaster at as286.net> wrote: > > James Bensley wrote on Wednesday, November 9, 2022 5:42 PM: >> Only when RIPE DB users start to update their AS-SET members field and add >> a source tag would operators with legacy IRRd versions start to have issues, >> and then they would have to update. But before that happens we can publicise >> the upcoming changes and give people a fair warning, we can try to provide >> resources on what the changes are, why they are beneficial [...] > > How many *years* you think is a "fair" warning before others have to accept, > that their own tooling breaks? (There's more than bgpq4 and IRRd and code > doing !i queries). > > Two, six or more than ten? > > Don't get me wrong, I like the idea to ensure, the right AS-SET is being > used and I know the pain, if not. Getting AS-SETs unique across all RRs or > being able to clearly identify the right RR to use would be great. (Even > though I would assume adoption might take -after the warning period- still > many years for a significant amount of updated AS-SETs to be seen.) > >> Firstly, I don't think we should be trying extra hard to maintain backwards >> comparability with IRRd v2/v3. If one allows customer/user inertia and/or >> ineptitude to steer the ship, Windows XP would still be in wide spread use, >> IPv6 adoption would never become wide spread, and so on. > > Breaking things just "because it helps" might not be the best choice. And > your example about XP is not right. Because your proposal comes closer to > turn off v4 (before a v6 stack was available for XP). > > I think we should try extra hard to maintain backward compatibility and only > if most agree, there's no other way and breaking things is the only way to > go forward and this saves the world, then it should/might happen. > > I think goal you like to achieve, the approach likely will not materialize > soon or at all. There might be and should be other ways ... > > > Markus > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/routing-wg
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Adding "::" notation to RIPE DB
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]