[routing-wg] RPKI vulnerable?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI vulnerable?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI vulnerable?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Warren Kumari
warren at kumari.net
Fri Feb 18 16:14:38 CET 2022
No, we don't, because then we'd have to more widely disclose the issue. Needs to be handled under extreme secrecy and embargoed disclosure while we design a mitigation... :-p W On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 9:11 AM Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote: > Warren Kumari wrote on 18/02/2022 15:02: > > This was the same person who alerted me to the also *shocking* discovery > > that longest-match wins, and so just twiddling local-pref doesn't save > you. > > Ye gods, do we have a CVE number for this? > > Nick > -- Perhaps they really do strive for incomprehensibility in their specs. After all, when the liturgy was in Latin, the laity knew their place. -- Michael Padlipsky -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20220218/b5e9400b/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI vulnerable?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI vulnerable?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]