[routing-wg] RPKI Quarterly Planning
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Quarterly Planning
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Quarterly Planning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Mon Jul 12 11:53:57 CEST 2021
To be perfectly clear: I have *no issues* with this plan at all! It is the total silence *on this list* that worries me. On 12 Jul 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Good morning, > > Natanlie pointed us to > https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/rpki/rpki-planning-and-roadmap > a while ago. Among other things this says: > > “In preparation for the improved RPKI repository architecture, the > distributed nature of the RRDP repository is going to be implemented > using containers and krill-sync that pulls data from the centralised > on-premise repository. This greatly simplifies smooth transitioning > between publication servers without any downtime. > > NOTE: We are not referring to cloud technologies here, just to our > internal deployment technologies.” > > The silence here worries me. > > I would like to see some feedback from this group whether this is what > you want to see happening. The RIPE Routing WG is the forum for giving > guidance to the RIPE NCC about RPKI. I know other channels exist too > and that is fine. I also know that individuals here seem to be happy > with what is happening. However private channels and conversations are > not the way RIPE does this. This group is where the RIPE NCC looks > for guidance and where that guidance gets properly archived and > responded to. > > Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Quarterly Planning
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Quarterly Planning
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]