[routing-wg] some stats for proposal 2018-06
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] some stats for proposal 2018-06
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] some stats for proposal 2018-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Thu Oct 18 12:25:12 CEST 2018
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:01:50PM +0300, Alexander Azimov wrote: > In the attachment is raw data that was used in > https://ripe77.ripe.net/presentations/123-RIPE-NONAUTH.azimov.pdf > It shows a list of globally visible prefixes that have route objects ONLY > in RIPE-NONAUTH. For these prefixes, the removal of route objects from this > database may lead to DoS. I somewhat disagree with your use of the word "denial of service" in this context. :-) The route objects are *only* removed if the owner of the prefix creates a RPKI ROA - and iff they *do* create a RPKI ROA, a route object is automatically published via NTT's IRR service. Question (which may be really hard to answer) - how many of those prefix holders are able to create RPKI ROAs for those prefixes? Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] some stats for proposal 2018-06
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] some stats for proposal 2018-06
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]