[routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Tue May 29 15:12:40 CEST 2018
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:03:48AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > On 28/05/2018 14:53, Job Snijders wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:16:34PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > >> On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote: > >> > >> Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where > >> does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics? > > > If someone registers a /25, and announces it, and the RPKI ROA > > allows it, then what is the problem? :-) > > I am not talking about a registered /25. I am talking about someone > hijacking your /24 or your /21 by announcing a bunch of /25s. I'm pretty sure the MANRS documentation suggests that you should not accept & propagate hijacked prefixes (regardless of prefix length). Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]