[routing-wg] Historical routing question

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:47:16PM +0300, Jorma Mellin wrote:
> Hot-potato routing can definitely be the reason for such a low AD for eBGP.

Since hot-potato only chooses "eBGP vs iBGP", AD has no relevance here.

Unless you put your eBGP targets into your OSPF, and we all know that
this is not a very good idea :-)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180411/28f23cc2/attachment.sig>