[routing-wg] [AusNOG] Do people even read these? Re: BGP Update Report
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [AusNOG] Do people even read these? Re: BGP Update Report
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] [AusNOG] Do people even read these? Re: BGP Update Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Mon Jun 20 17:07:10 CEST 2016
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 05:02:48PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:52:58PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber wrote: > > But in general, I think it doesn't have real impact, since the > > potential for reducing the size of the DFZ, as also set out in these > > reports, would have been reacted upon since decades (literally). > > > > I guess it is just proof that the cost of manpower, distributed across > > the 'net, is still more expensive than installing more memory in the > > boxes. Sigh... > > I look through each report for occurances of ASNs I am related to in one > way or another and if I take action. ^^^ if so, I take action to resolve it. The impact is real, but depends on people taking the effort to look through the reports and act where they can.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [AusNOG] Do people even read these? Re: BGP Update Report
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] [AusNOG] Do people even read these? Re: BGP Update Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]