[routing-wg] Working group chairs rotation
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Working group chairs rotation
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Survey about RPKI/DNSSEC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benno Overeinder
benno at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Sep 24 21:40:56 CEST 2014
On 15/09/14 17:45, Gert Doering wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Rob Evans wrote: >> The RIPE Routing Working Group should attempt to maintain two >> Chairpersons whenever possible. As a large part of the work of >> the Chairpersons is in creating an agenda for the Working Group >> meetings at RIPE meetings, these are generally appointed by >> consensus of those present at a Working Group meeting. >> >> Each of the Chairpersons may periodically offer to stand down to >> allow new candidates to stand in their place. The Chairperson >> that wishes to stand down should announce that to the Working >> Group?s mailing list two weeks before the meeting. Nominations >> for Chairpersons may be accepted up to the day before the >> Working Group?s meeting. >> >> Thoughts? I like the light-weight procedure for (s)electing a chairperson. Should this also part of the charter, or no... that will make it less light-weight. :-) Important is that procedure is known, so thanks. > I wonder if "up to the day before the meeting" is a bit short, in > case you should end up having more than a single victim^Wcandidate, > and the WG wants to decide based on individual merits, or so. I agree, one day before makes it a bit short if you want to talk with one or the other candidate. So maybe a compromise like nominations are accepted up to 12.00 pm or 3.00 pm on the day before the meeting? Cheers, -- Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Working group chairs rotation
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Survey about RPKI/DNSSEC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]