[routing-wg] AS201640
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] AS201640
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] access control in other regions' IRR DB [was: Re: AS201640]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun Nov 9 20:59:11 CET 2014
Hi, On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 11:48:36AM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > P.S. I'm still a bit befuddled by what happened in this case. Would it > be a fair characterization to say that what AS201640 has done in this > case is to exploit a kind of loophole which is uniquely present only > when the hijacker/squatter AS is registered in one RiR and the IP blocks > that are being hijacked/squatted are registered in a different RiR? Yes. > Also, could this scenario have been replicated if the origin AS had > been registered in/by ARIN, APNIC, LACNIC, or AFRINIC, rather than > RIPE? I'm not sure how the access control in other regions' IRR DBs work - but at least ARIN's database is based on RIPE code, so "it might be". > If so, then a proper sort of fix will necessarily involve all > five RiRs, no? Correct. George Michaelson is from APNIC, so "they are aware", and I'm fairly sure the other RIRs are being informed. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20141109/2eda89b1/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] AS201640
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] access control in other regions' IRR DB [was: Re: AS201640]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]