[routing-wg] network failed, was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes
Wilfried Woeber Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Sun Jun 16 06:57:31 CEST 2013
Randy Bush wrote: > [ discussion about st00pidity omitted ] > > >>Generally (no warranty expressed or implied) the only thing you need >>to worry about is that the correct objects are present and protected >>from change by others with an appropriate maintainer. You hope that >>all other objects referring to the same routes are benign, in the >>sense that although they would potentially allow a bad thing to >>happen, at least they don't mess with the good thing that you want to >>happen. > > > which is what seems to be what happened here, though i do not completely > understand. was hoping someone could explain the sequence of events, > and what alan should/could have done. > > randy Randy, all, I already do have a response (and sort of explanation) from the NCC DB folks. I received it just before hopping on a plane to Asia. I'll dig it up soon and forward to the list. Sorry for the delay, Wilfried.