[routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Sep 12 23:40:10 CEST 2012
On 12.09.2012, at 22:46 , Florian Weimer wrote: > ... If the prefixes end up in RIS, this could come from leakage > by a Swisscom customer (and another upstream which doesn't filter > properly), or a misconfigured BGP peering for the RIS data feed. Looks like AS35054 is to blame: https://stat.ripe.net/widget/looking-glass#w%5Bresource%5D=80/5 : IIRC we talked to them ages ago and it was difficult for them to give RIS another view in Geneva. But my recollection may be wrong ... Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20120912/83225476/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screen Shot 2012-09-12 at 23.37.33 .png Type: image/png Size: 69961 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20120912/83225476/attachment.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]