[routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Markstaller
mm at elabnet.de
Tue Sep 11 21:10:01 CEST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11.09.2012 20:21, Carlos M. martinez wrote: > As with many new technologies, if we wait for everybody to 'do it', > then no one ends up 'doing it'. Ok, I agree, will do ASAP! But will it help ? I'm not sure if I get larger companies on this track, really.. One example: I'm doing PGP-signing for 14yrs now, nothing changed, the "best" result is proprietary "DE-MAIL".. Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBPjIgACgkQaWRHV2kMuAKuQACfcr4DpYA2wbF1RnLBdBkZDibk 9D4AoKmO23S4PREp0O2Tr3ssCwpuJU1B =2R4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]