[routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Carlos M. martinez carlosm3011 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 17:23:15 CEST 2012
Are your trobules traceable to the covering announcement? More specifics should always win, period. Regardless even of BGP attributes, so I'm curious if your issues are traceable to the /5. regards, ~Carlos On 9/11/12 12:09 PM, Michael Markstaller wrote: > Hi, > > just a formal question: > Is it good/best practice for Swisscom to announce 80/5 into BGP ? > (which covers our assignment 184.108.40.206/20 and many others) > > More-specific wins, sure.. but we had some troubles yesterday, so just > a question to ask.. > > If it's the wrong ML, sorry, happy to get redirected.. > > >