[routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arturo Servin
aservin at lacnic.net
Mon Feb 7 14:02:25 CET 2011
Question. When you refer to the last /8: Do you refer to the last /8 given to RIPE NCC by IANA? or The last /8 stock of addresses in RIPE (generated may be by fragments from several other /8s)? Thanks, .as On 7 Feb 2011, at 10:43, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html#----use-of-last----for-pa-allocations > > 5.6 Use of last /8 for PA Allocations > <snip> > • Allocations for LIRs from the last /8 > > On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses according to the following: > > a. LIRs may only receive one allocation from this /8. The size of the allocation made under this policy will be exactly one /22. > > b. LIRs receive only one /22, even if their needs justify a larger allocation. > <snip> > > So neither minimum or maximum I guess. But exactly a /22. > > Nurani > > On 7 feb 2011, at 12.38, Max Tulyev wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> so _minimum_ or _maximum_? >> >> 07.02.11 11:31, Andrea Cima написав(ла): >>> The minimum allocation size for this /8 has been set at /22. >> >> -- >> WBR, >> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO) >>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]