[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 28 00:03:59 CEST 2010
> I suppose the question Rob and I are trying to address is, do we want to > encourage ISPs to take their /32 and announce all 65536 /48s in an > effort to do some kind of amazing traffic engineering act by juggling > all 65k prefixes at once? no > Or do we want to encourage ISPs to think aggregation, and only leak the > subprefixes that they need to leak to support their multihoming > customers and traffic engineering requirements? yes > Anyway, the doc would just be recommendations and how many years did it take to clean up the ripe docco on route flap dampening recommendations? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]