[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Apr 27 13:27:22 CEST 2010
On 27/04/2010 11:29, David Freedman wrote: > Could we not use current ipv4 deaggregation + growth to make some > estimations about what could happen with ipv6? we could - we just haven't. And I'm concerned at what the ipv4 deaggregation frequency looks like: http://twinkie.foobar.org/~nick/ipv4-freq-linear-axis.png http://twinkie.foobar.org/~nick/ipv4-freq-log-axis.png Same data in both cases - just different axis scaling. /24 was noted retrospectively in ripe-399 - it had been a de-facto standard for a very long time. We don't have this convention in ipv6. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]