[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request

• Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
• Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rob Evans rhe at nosc.ja.net
Mon Apr 19 17:05:06 CEST 2010

I'll be interested in hearing what the rest of the working group has to 
say on this.  When the document was last presented to the group, at the 
meeting in Lisbon, it was felt that /36 was an appropriate level to 
limit the worst cases of deaggregation.

Is there still a demand for this document to progress?

> Every organization is autonomous in terms of its IT infrastructure and
> in terms of its connection to the Internet.

Is PI a more appropriate fit for this?

Rob

• Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
• Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ routing-wg Archives ]