[routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Mon Oct 20 15:34:20 CEST 2008
On 20/10/2008, at 15:16, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Gert Doering wrote: > [...] >> I've asked the routing- and DB-WG chairs to send a "heads up" to >> their >> respective working groups, so that interested parties can >> participate in >> the discussion (if needed), and because it will also need an >> implementation >> change in the RIPE DB software. > > I presume this will end up as a task for the RIPE NCC for our region. > > But... Just as a reminder or marker - who or which group is expected > to update the (relevant) tools these days? I am guessing that would be their respective maintainers or, for full open source projects, whoever implements the necessary changes. For instance, the IRRToolset is currently a community project, with some resource backing to ensure regular integration of patches submitted by contributors (see http://irrtoolset.isc.org/ for details) > And, do we have an common > understanding of the term "relevant" in this context? :-) > i think this is a classical feedback loop :-) Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]