[routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
tp
ripe at dial.pipex.com
Fri Dec 7 12:12:03 CET 2007
Not sure if you aware but there is an IETF Internet Draft winging its way through the system on this topic, namely http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-05. txt It did get discussed on the IETF idr list in October 2006, and met significant resistance. There were also comments then about NANOG taking a position on this. I haven't seen any discussion since. Current status is Application Director Watching Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Evans" <rhe at nosc.ja.net> To: <routing-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 11:59 PM Subject: [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation > Folks, > > One of the items that was discussed during the working group meeting > in Amsterdam was the relative benefits of using asplain, asdot or > asdot+ to represent four byte autonomous system numbers. The chairs > feel that the discussion tended towards favouring asdot/asdot+, which > is already used relatively widely, but with the note that people do > need to review their in-house tools and scripts to ensure they will > work with numbers expressed in this notation. > > Cheers, > Rob >
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Four byte ASN notation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]