[routing-wg]Re: AW: [db-wg] Call for agenda items, DB-WG Meeting during RIPE53, Amsterdam
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Thu Sep 14 22:31:40 CEST 2006
Rob Evans wrote: [...] > 1) A quick call for help in editing the document to create a proposal. > > 2) If we've got a draft of a proposal by then, discussion on it. [ NOT waering my DB-WG Chair hat right now, just my Security Team Member's hat ] Any such document should be very clear and broad in describing the potential security and/or operational impacts and risks incurred by relaxing the established rules. (IRR Sanity and filter Configuration Tools) Some stuff that occurs to me immediately is - impact on ability to use (own or hi-jacked) IP-Address-Blocks for Spam-Runs, - to get address blocks routed differently for the duration of DoS Attacks, - to impede connectivity tracking mechanisms for Phishing Sites - to punch more specific holes into a PA Block - to claim customer relationship without a contract in place - to effectively make a (subset) of a PI block usable as PI - to cheat with eXchange Point Access Policy Requirements - to .... > Either way, we need to have someone willing to talk and an idea of how > long you want to talk for! :-) > > All the best, > Rob Another bout of CERT Paranoia maybe, yours, Wilfried.