[routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at apnic.net
Sun Dec 3 07:09:17 CET 2006
At 12:18 AM 2/12/2006, Kurt Kayser wrote: >Hi Randy, > >Randy Bush wrote: >>>Is inter-IXP-traffic really typical/necessary? >> >>>from a router on IX A, i want a nice clean traceroute to a router on IX >>B, and only have access to that IX via my friend's network on IX A. > >If the router is not an IXP-owned router, each participating router >is in a "normal" AS. > >But I might be really wrong in order to save a couple of 2-Byte AS-numbers, >but somehow I have the feeling that 2-Byte space is out much faster >that anticipated. Nope - the 2byte number consumption is pretty much right on schedule. >So how far are we in globally reachable 4-Byte AS-numbers yet? >(different topic). Ask your vendor about the state of their code! Geoff
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]