This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Apr 28 19:24:28 CEST 2006
> Other presentations this week have shown a small number of prefixes > contribute the majority of updates to the BGP table. If route flap > damping in its current form isn't the answer to this, what is? Is > education sufficient? Do we need an "Update Police"? i suggested that the rfd spec be modified, at least to be per-prefix as opposed to prefix+path, to allow the disaster prefixes to be easily detected and damped. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]