[routing-wg]Re: More specific prefix announce
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Sep 2 01:40:50 CEST 2005
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:01:16AM +0500, dendy at ulm.udsu.ru wrote: > We have a /20 ASSIGNED PI address block and an AS. Is it allowed by RIPE > policy to intentionally announce more specific prefix than one we > have from our AS to upstream ASes? Yes. RIPE has no rules regarding BGP announcements. Wether it's a good practice and/or socially accepted is a different matter. :-) Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]