survey on BGP damping
- Previous message (by thread): survey on BGP damping
- Next message (by thread): Announcement Routing Registry Training Courses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Konrad Plich
konradpl at zt.piotrkow.tpsa.pl
Fri Dec 12 23:35:24 CET 2003
P:olish Telecom do not have damping switched on. On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Beichuan Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > We are conducting a survey of BGP damping deployment and would greatly > appreciate if you could take a few minutes to answer the following > questions. There are a number of interesting results and various > recommendations for damping settings. However, we have found only limited > information on who does(does not) deploy damping and what parameter > settings are selected in practice. > > If you are willing to participate, please send replies directly to us. > We will collect the results (removing any private information regarding > specific sites) and post the results to the list. Thanks! > > --- > beichuan > > > (1) Does your AS have BGP route flap damping turned on? > * Yes > * No (please skip to comments) > > (2) What damping parameters do you use? > * Cisco Default > * Juniper Default > * RIPE recommendation > * Customized > > (3) On which links do you enable damping? > * To customers only > * To providers > * To peers > * All the above > > (4) Comments > Please tell us more such as: > > What kind of network are you managing (any specific names will be removed > in the published study)? > Why (why not) do you enable damping? > If you enable damping, why did you choose your current parameters? > Has your site seen specific problems that were prevented by damping > (or caused by damping)? > > We welcome any other comments you feel are relevant. Thanks! > > > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): survey on BGP damping
- Next message (by thread): Announcement Routing Registry Training Courses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]