[ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Fwd: Sanctions and the Internet report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu May 11 16:01:40 CEST 2023
On 11/05/2023 14:51, Joe Abley wrote: > Following on from my previous comment, I think it would be better to > focus on avoiding *actual* conflicts of interest. I think worrying > about appearances is what happens when there is a lack of understanding > of the substance and, in the case of managing a useful and > productive collaboration between the community and > NCC-as-secretariat,the substance seems important. > > If the goal is to avoid a need for understanding, then it seems like the > natural solution is that NCC staff should never be allowed to > participate as members of the community at all. I don't think that is > necessary or desirable. If we had a perfect world then I'd agree with you. However I've been in this business long enough to know that if there is a faintest chance of a possible thought of a conflict then someone will complain. However, I'm not part of this community any longer in any real sense, and if people think this isn't important then go for it. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] ripe-list Digest, Vol 139, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Fwd: Sanctions and the Internet report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]