[ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Lamparter
equinox at diac24.net
Sun Feb 20 14:28:58 CET 2022
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:01:49PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote: > You can't declare consensus in something that was developed by a TF > that discriminated even a single participant from being part of the > TF. Consensus is not unanimity. And task forces or workgroups have no inherent need to include everyone. In fact, consensus decision-making tries to cope with social situations where a few participants are unable or unwilling to learn, understand and adhere to established (by consensus) social interaction parameters. Since I have no relevant standing and no reputational damage to fear, I will just go and opine that you, JORDI, fall into that category. It is my impression that you might be unable to participate in a constructive manner. I am regretfully not skilled in how to express this in a way that may help you more to address this. If I were, I certainly would. I would also like to point out that the tolerance you've enjoyed hitherto can have negative impact and costs in alienating others from participating in this forum. I do not have the necessary insight to make that determination but am painfully aware and afraid of the possibility. -David (I have said my piece and will not be reading or responding in any manner on this matter, neither on-list nor on any other channel. I'm pretty close to being alienated-out myself here.)
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The RIPE Code of Conduct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]