[ripe-list] [diversity] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote on 26/03/2021 09:50:
> I can't agree with that:

At this point, is there anything left that you do agree with? :)

> 1) Inputs from the legal team, should be open and transparently presented to the community.

Task forces, committees, etc have reporting structures which allow them 
room to do what they are tasked to do, and then report back.

There's no general principle which mandates that they need to report 
every single input, and doing so would slow down their work output to a 
crawl.

> 2) As with any other documents, policies, etc., Community should be able to provide any inputs that we believe necessary, and not just "general principles or specific questions".

I don't believe any tf / committee has said that they don't want 
community input.  Most, or indeed all of them go out of their way to 
solicit this.

That's why we have mailing lists like, for example, diversity at .

> I want to insist in asking what is the rational for excluding anyone from a TF,

Looking at this from a different point of view, you're asking whether 
people have the right to barge their way on to a task force or committee.

Could you point us to any TF structure or committee structure anywhere 
in the world which accepts this on a point of principle?

Nick