[ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Martin-Legene
rlegene at gmail.com
Thu Feb 11 19:18:01 CET 2021
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 05.00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list, < ripe-list at ripe.net> wrote: > > It could also be the other way round. People might be discouraged to > run > against the long-time chairs. > > > **** Exactly, that's was my point, it looks that I was not able to find > the best wording. I've seen that in other organizations, not just here. > > 1) You ask for volunteers to replace "existing co-chair a" > 2) There are 1-2 volunteers > 3) "existing co-chair a" say, I will also volunteer to continue > 4) There are comments like "existing co-chair a" has been there for long > time, he knows the job ... > 5) the 1-2 volunteers then drop-out. > Some believe elections for chair means to reelect if the former chair did OK. I believe Jordi's observation above is correct. It makes the community seem smaller, rather than invite in new people. I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the seat really was vacant. -- robert > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210211/658195da/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]