[ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Wed Feb 10 13:27:07 CET 2021
Hi, Please see inline. On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote: > Hi all, > <snip> > (...) > > It is even more sad that some of those provocations come from people > that are (or have been) chairs of WGs and I think they must be > exemplary. It looks like some of them believe they are kings. Maybe one > more thing to change in the PDP is a maximum number of terms to avoid > this. I completely support this! 2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG. > I think also sanctions of the AUP should be stricter in those cases and > this shows that also we are missing in the PDP a procedure for > recalling chairs. For those that aren?t aware, this just happened in > AFRINIC (a Recall Committee has decided that both cochairs are recalled > with immediate effect, in short because they violated the PDP and took > decisions or attributions beyond what is set in the PDP). I think the general idea is not to have frequent "impeachments", but establish a process where a WG chair change (against his/her own will, when they violate the PDP) isn't halted at some point by one of its friends. Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] excuses for my response to provocations in the list yesterday
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]