[ripe-list] consensus defintions
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Feb 9 14:22:41 CET 2021
> On 9 Feb 2021, at 12:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list <ripe-list at ripe.net> wrote: > > Even if only me see those problems (which again is not the case, according to WGCC summary), still there is a chance that with the discussion of the proposal others support it and we can find a point where objections are invalid. This is what consensus mean. It does not mean that. You are wrong. Please read RFC7282. I quote: "Consensus is when everyone is sufficiently satisfied with the chosen solution, such that they no longer have specific objections to it.” Everyone is not sufficiently satisfied with your proposal(s) - QED - so by definition there cannot be a consensus for them.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Collective Meeting Summary
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] consensus defintions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]