[ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Feb 8 14:36:38 CET 2021
> On 7 Feb 2021, at 21:46, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > > Only responding to your proposal. I think this is a horrible idea. > Things are rarely, if ever, solved by inventing more layers of > bureaucracy. Creating an appeals committee is about the worst way to > deal with your unhappiness that the chairs don't agree with you. +1000 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 528 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210208/c092fab8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] repeated and continued PDP violation - WG chairs delaying or denying proposal publication - new policy proposal "Ensure Neutrality of PDP Appeals Procedure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]