[ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Aug 25 21:33:35 CEST 2021
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:18:06PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > There is no question in my mind that the former category of information MUST > be held in confidence by RIPE NCC. The latter category, maybe not so much. I agree that otherwise easily attainable information ("chamber of commerce") does not need to be treated as "confidential". OTOH, maybe it's just the easiest approach to things - "keep *any* document submitted by the LIR as 'confidential'" - so there is no need for individual NCC employees to decide on the nature of a document (especially given that in RIPE land, something which might be "semi-public" in country A might be not easily attainable in country B). But I do not *know*, I'm just thinking out loud. Gert Doering -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20210825/83f9f83d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Confidentiality, or that lack thereof
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]