[ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Apr 12 15:46:29 CEST 2021
> On 12 Apr 2021, at 14:16, Erik Bais <ebais at a2b-internet.com> wrote: > > In the document, there is no mention of unwanted behaviour / attention that could be classified as stalking. IMO, that’s not a bug. It’s a feature. The CoC should just talk about inappropriate behaviour as a general concept and not attempt to enumerate every possible type of inappropriate behaviour. That way lies madness... The current draft has an illustrative (non-definitive) list of unacceptable behaviour and that should be good enough. BTW, the CoC should say “behaviour” not “behaviours”. According to the grammar police, behaviour is a mass noun -- like traffic, health, fairness, nonsense, etc -- and therefore doesn’t get pluralised.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] Updated Draft RIPE Code of Conduct Published for Community Review
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]