[ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue May 26 12:56:40 CEST 2020
> On 26 May 2020, at 09:49, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > >> Jim, you then go on to quote directly from RFC7282 which says very clearly that the concerns DO need to be addressed. > > Jim quoted it the wrong way around: concerns have to be addressed, but not accommodated. Correct. You all know what I meant anyway: we already have rough consensus for the status quo. Thanks Sander. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 528 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-list/attachments/20200526/61f5d763/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] The NomCom Requests your Support
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]