[ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Mon Oct 21 12:47:34 CEST 2019
Randy, <frank and direct> Of course I am flattered by your trust in the RIPE community. I am worried about just the abuse that you mention in the IETF context. I see the RIPE community changing and I remain concerned about abuse in the future. Yes we need to evolve our CoC *** with the appropriate checks and balances against abuse ***. <emotional> The violent reactions I get when I say this are worrisome and they hurt! Ah, full circle back to the subject. Ironic, isn‘t it? Maybe I should see a trusted contact? </all> Daniel --- Sent from a handheld device. > On 20. Oct 2019, at 17:46, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>wrote: > > hi leslie: > > i agree with you, in this context and with the proposal's intent within > the ripe culture. > > <tactless> > > i suspect that there are a number of us who are made uncomfortable, not > by this proposal, but because, at the same time, a coc change process is > occurring in the ietf, where it is being used to suppress dissent with > the corporatisation and destruction of the structure and to actually > protect a clique of bullies. > > </tactless> > > but again, i agree with you, and support the coc proposal. > > randy > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]