This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Mon Oct 21 12:47:34 CEST 2019
Randy, <frank and direct> Of course I am flattered by your trust in the RIPE community. I am worried about just the abuse that you mention in the IETF context. I see the RIPE community changing and I remain concerned about abuse in the future. Yes we need to evolve our CoC *** with the appropriate checks and balances against abuse ***. <emotional> The violent reactions I get when I say this are worrisome and they hurt! Ah, full circle back to the subject. Ironic, isn‘t it? Maybe I should see a trusted contact? </all> Daniel --- Sent from a handheld device. > On 20. Oct 2019, at 17:46, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>wrote: > > hi leslie: > > i agree with you, in this context and with the proposal's intent within > the ripe culture. > > <tactless> > > i suspect that there are a number of us who are made uncomfortable, not > by this proposal, but because, at the same time, a coc change process is > occurring in the ietf, where it is being used to suppress dissent with > the corporatisation and destruction of the structure and to actually > protect a clique of bullies. > > </tactless> > > but again, i agree with you, and support the coc proposal. > > randy > >
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] CoC and the PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]