[ripe-list] RIPE Accountability Task Force Update at RIPE 75
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Accountability Task Force Update at RIPE 75
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Accountability Task Force Update at RIPE 75
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Thu Oct 19 12:21:04 CEST 2017
On 19/10/2017 10:27, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > On 19.10.2017 10:36, Nigel Titley wrote: >> The NCC Board does of course take account of policies, and also comments >> on them as part of the evaluation process that the NCC does during >> policy development. In all cases up until now we have instructed the NCC >> to follow policy. However, as board members we have certain fiduciary >> duties which cannot be overridden by policy. Faced with a situation such >> as Jim describes we have two choices: not implement the policy or resign >> and hope that someone else agrees to carry the can. > maybe that would be something then that could be put into the board's > rules of internal procedure: that the board sees to have all RIPE > policies be implemented by the NCC to the greatest extend possible, but > limited to the board's fiduciary duties? > If it makes people happier then I'm sure we could do this. I'm generally against additional complication, especially where past practice doesn't give cause to worry, but as I say it doesn't really bother me. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Accountability Task Force Update at RIPE 75
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-list] RIPE Accountability Task Force Update at RIPE 75
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]