Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
- Next message (by thread): Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Thu May 8 18:15:37 CEST 2014
At Thu, 8 May 2014 16:20:54 +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 8 May 2014, at 15:46, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > > > As "proposals" aren't people I am not sure whether the decision to change > > the timeline sits with the proposer, the WG chair, or someone else. > > Leo, like pretty much everything else in RIPE, this should be a > consensus decision by the relevant WG(s). The WG chair should be > responsible for making that happen. > > I would have hoped it was not necessary to document this. IMO, RIPE > needs to keep process and "rules" to the absolute minimum. As I read it, Leo's point is that, since the unfortunate phrase, "Individual proposals may choose ..." has to be corrected, we may as well choose the appropriate correction. ATB /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
- Next message (by thread): Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]