Updates to RIPE-500: Policy Development in RIPE
Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Thu May 8 17:20:54 CEST 2014
On 8 May 2014, at 15:46, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: > As "proposals" aren't people I am not sure whether the decision to change > the timeline sits with the proposer, the WG chair, or someone else. Leo, like pretty much everything else in RIPE, this should be a consensus decision by the relevant WG(s). The WG chair should be responsible for making that happen. I would have hoped it was not necessary to document this. IMO, RIPE needs to keep process and "rules" to the absolute minimum.