[ripe-db-requirements-tf] Follow-up items from face-to-face meeting at RIPE 79

Hi Shane, 

The updated charter in your previous email looks good, thanks! 

Personally I believe we already have enough people with the required knowledge and representation base on the TF in the originally assigned 6. Nothing against Théophile at all, more that I don't really see the need for additional people at this early stage. 

> He looks forward to lots of detailed discussion 
> about the requirements document, and especially his own involvement in that.

Community feedback is always welcome of course but tomorrow's update at the DB WG is only to communicate who the TF is, our purpose and charter etc. rather than hold a detailed discussion about the requirements? 

Regards, 
James 

> On October 16, 2019 at 11:48 AM Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Friends,
> 
> I talked to Hans Petter Holen last night, and neither of us were sure 
> who is allowed to update the charter or approve (or not) proposed 
> changes. 😉 Given that, I think we're okay to update the items to 
> deliver and the associated dates, as per my previous mail with a 
> proposed updated charter.
> 
> Hans Petter was not super enthusiastic about adding people to the task 
> force. I am sure that he can be convinced, but clearly I fucked up by 
> inviting Théophile along to our meeting. I'm basically happy for 
> Théophile to join or not, whatever we think makes the most sense.
> 
> I talked to Denis Walker this morning, and let him know that at least I 
> will be at the Database Working Group session tomorrow to explain what 
> this task force is. He looks forward to lots of detailed discussion 
> about the requirements document, and especially his own involvement in that.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Shane
>