[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurtis Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Thu May 14 16:41:39 CEST 2020
> On 14 May 2020, at 14:52, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote: > > Would it not be possible for Mirjam to resign from the RIPE NCC once she is selected just as well. Or is she tainted for life? First of all I think we should avoid the use of “tainted” and secondly I was trying to keep the arguments on a principe level and discussed the separation of RIPE and RIPE NCC, not any individual circumstances around candidates. The Nomcom has asked for feedback and I was trying to provide mine here as I have also done in private to the Nomcom. To answer your question - I am assuming by it that we have made the assumption that we want to keep separation between RIPE NCC and RIPE. If so, obviously no-one is associated with an ex-employer for life. In governance, both public and private it is commonly assumed that for certain (at least senior) roles you will keep a distance in time between roles to ensure that real or perceived conflict of interest is avoided. How long this time should (or none) can be debated. - kurtis - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20200514/095593d0/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]