[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu May 14 11:07:29 CEST 2020
On Thu, 14 May 2020, Lars-Johan Liman wrote: (...) > > I wish we hade a wide selection of excellent candidates. We don't. What > we have is a limited set of candidates, all of which, IMHO, are likely > to do a very good job if chosen. Responsibility of being RIPE chair is > something that only a limited set of peole can (for personal reasons) > and will want to carry. Exactly. Now it crossed my mind it would be good if someone had the idea of nominating you. But unfortunately we're beyond that point. > I wish we had the same amount of engagement in _participating_ (as in > being an active member of a group or committee) in the process as we do > in criticising the output. We don't. I didn't quite see 200 ppl turn up > for a seat on the NomCom. There was the "criteria", which (at least) i failed to complain about in due time :-) (...) > I will give my feedback to the Nomcom and support my favourite > candidate, and I will give the NomCom the cred the deserve. I will do the same, and i must say i would have liked to see at least three of the NomCom members on the candidate list (which seems to be clearly incompatible...) Regards, Carlos
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]