[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Oct 11 18:11:27 CEST 2018
>>> it is somewhat odd that meeting attendance is the criterion in a >>> community which claims that the mailing lists are the place where >>> work is done. and, of course, this is re-discussed. >> >> Yes, there is a contradiction there. Sort of. However for RIPE, we're >> appointing a Chair whose responsibilities largely focus around RIPE >> meetings, not the work or policy-making that supposedly gets done on >> RIPE's mailing lists. Drawing from the people who regularly >> participate in RIPE meetings for both the Nomcom and Chair seems the >> most sensible choice to me. > > I don’t think we should forget those who are active in the community > that can’t attend the RIPE meetings for whatever reason, by active I > mean via the mailing lists or remote meeting participation. > > So I think the criteria should be to have been active in the RIPE > community over the last x years by attending at least y RIPE meetings > OR by being active on a RIPE mailing list in the last x years. i am not sure i see a major clue level difference between attendees and mailing list participants. but i am a poor judge as i am good at avoiding. but i take jim's point that the chair is the *meeting* chair. rob used to do a fair bit of external relations; not sure about hph, and not sure what is really needed. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]