[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Oct 11 16:40:57 CEST 2018
>>>> Would it work if we let PC appoint NomCom? There are probably problems >>>> with this that I don't see. >>> No. The same perceived problems arise with whatever group appoints the >>> Nomcom. >> >> so don't *appoint* the nomcom at all. random selection. but i already >> said that. > > I think the problem with a random selection is just that, it’s random, > would you really want someone who has never been involved with the > RIPE community picking the potential next RIPE chair? the ietf has the same problem. which is why it is random selection from a QUALIFIED pool of volunteers. in the ietf's case, the sole qualification is attended N out of the last M meetings. where N and M are in one of the RFC citations i gave. it is somewhat odd that meeting attendance is the criterion in a community which claims that the mailing lists are the place where work is done. and, of course, this is re-discussed. it is all spelled out in horrid detail in the rfc cites i gave back in this thread. hard as it is to believe, the ietf is even more obsessed about documenting corner cases than the ripe wannabe technical lawyers. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]