This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Oct 8 19:02:05 CEST 2018
> On 8 Oct 2018, at 17:57, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >>>> "The RIPE community will endorse the candidate put forward by the WG >>>> Chair collective." >>> oh, you mean the collective that appoints the nomcom? >>> you can see where this appears a bit loose and sloppy >> >> No Randy, I don’t. > > then let me try again. > > is the candidate put forward by the wg chair collective or by a nomcom. > i keep hearing stereo. How hard can it be? The selection process After a shortlist of potential candidates has been identified, the NomCom will hand it over to the WG Chair collective. The WG Chair collective will actively gather feedback from the RIPE community about each candidate. Based on this feedback, the WG Chair collective will select the best candidate for the job. The RIPE community will endorse the candidate put forward by the WG Chair collective. In short, the Nomcom comes up with a short list. The WGCC chooses someone from that list (or tells the Nomcom to come up with a better list). The WGCC choice goes to the RIPE Community for final approval.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair Selection Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]