[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed May 24 10:39:37 CEST 2017
Hi Daniel, breaking it down the way you did here: On 24.05.2017 05:34, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Not in my mind. The charter of the accountability task force reads to > me as a 'find holes' mission. We have narrowly avoided the charter to > slso say 'and plug them for us'. > > The charter also excludes looking at the RIPE NCC, which is an > essential part of the success story because it allows RIPE itself to > stay simple and informal. I am not saying that the NCC needs > changing! > > Whst I think is missing is a description of the underlying > principles, how they came about and how they made RIPE work so > well. > > This is a related but different thing. It certsinly is something that > clould be *extremely helpful* for the task force. makes quite some sense to me as well. :-) Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]