[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Daniel Karrenberg daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Thu May 18 12:51:54 CEST 2017
Can we all calm down a bit please? We all know each other and I do assume the best intentions on everyone's part. I am also quite sure that we are not out to hurt each other or to have an overly polemic debate. The good thing is that there is a lot of passion here for the future of RIPE. Let's be positive! Daniel On 18.05.17 10:55 , Nurani Nimpuno wrote: > >> On 18 May 2017, at 10:51, Nigel Titley <nigel at titley.com> wrote: >> >> On 18/05/17 07:15, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: >> ... >> I think you've been in close proximity to ICANN folk for far too long. > > Ok, that’s a low shot. > With that, I think I will withdraw from this discussion. > > Nurani > >> YOU may not find it helpful but it is in fact a job description and a >> process. Other people have found it helpful. >> >>> >>> And while I also don’t want something over prescriptive, I do think that unless we do away with the concept of a RIPE chair, we need to define it in a way that people can understand it. >> >> There are many positions that don't have a written job description but >> are nevertheless well regarded, understood and accepted. >> >> Nigel