This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Wed May 17 20:19:15 CEST 2017
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 07:09:53PM +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 17/05/17 16:49, Job Snijders wrote: > > If we as community can manage to put together an Executive Board, a > > team of Arbiters, and a Program Committee, surely we can manage to > > figure out how and who should appointed a RIPE chair. > > I would respectfully remind you that the EB is elected by the RIPE NCC > members and the Arbiters are appointed by the General meeting. Neither > are actually put together by "The Community" (tm). Do you believe that "The Community [tm]" and "RIPE NCC members" are significantly disjoint groups of stakeholders? Are they so far disjoint in their instantiation, history, and operations; that analogies are inappropiate? Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]