[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed May 17 19:56:12 CEST 2017
On 17/05/17 15:09, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > On 17.05.17 12:35 , Nigel Titley wrote: >> Could I make a suggestion: >> >> 1. RIPE Chair job description: Doing the sort of things that the RIPE >> Chair should do. >> >> 2. RIPE Chair selection process: Selected as needed >> >> Both of these definitions seem to have worked fine in the past and have >> the benefit of not involving legions of amateur lawyers who might be >> better involved in doing something useful. > > > I second this proposal. > > Let me propose a friendly amendment based on both the concerns about > continuity and the axiom that a sound minimal process has to have three > elements. [https://de.wiktionary.org/wiki/aller_guten_Dinge_sind_drei] > > 3. RIPE Chair Continuity: The RIPE Chair may appoint and dismiss a vice > chair. An excellent amendment. Thank you Nigel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20170517/44428447/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]