[ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection (was: RIPE Chair Job description)

• Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection
• Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] (no subject)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carsten Schiefner ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sun Oct 23 14:07:17 CEST 2016

All -

I take side with Shane and Jim here: I cannot see any need to rush this
trough. It shall get the time it needs - as I am sure no one intends to
stretch this over the next decade.

And my reading of Shane's proposal for aiming at RIPE 75 rather than 74
was that it's purely inidicative but not mandatory.

Best,

	-C.

On 21.10.2016 14:05, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Filiz & all,
> 
> tl;dr I think we need an in-person discussion of the procedure. We need
>       to have the discussion at RIPE 73, or defer using the procedure
>       until we have had the discussion.
> 
> More words:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Shane

• Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] In-person discussion of RIPE Chair Selection
• Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] (no subject)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ripe-chair-discuss Archives ]